Accessibility report parkering.stockholm
The City of Stockholm is responsible for the website parkering.stockholm. Our goal is that as many as possible will be able to use it.
The City of Stockholm is responsible for the website parkering.stockholm. Our goal is that as many as possible will be able to use it.
On this page we give information about
how the website lives up to the law of accessibility to digital public service
any known problems concerning accessibility
how you can report any problems or flaws so that we can correct or adjust them
What to do if you cannot use parts of the website
If you need access to information for the website in any other format than what is provided you can contact us for assistance.
The normal response time is two working days.
We are constantly improving the website. Below we will list accessibility issues and shortcomings that we are working to improve. Please let us know if you find more issues, or if you think we do not meet the requirements of the law. It makes it easier for us to apply corrections and adapt accessibility going forward.
The agency for digital government (Digg) has the supervisory responsibility to make sure the law of accessibility of digital public service is upheld. If you are not satisfied with the way we handle your complaints, you can contact the supervisory agency to make your complaints heard.
Report lack of accessibility, the website of the agency for digital government (in Swedish)
On the website of Digg, you can also read about the law, and who is covered by it.
The website start.stockholm is partially compatible with level AA in the standard Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.2. The information and content which is not available is listed below.
If parts of a web page's content are in a language other than that specified for the page, a screen reader cannot read this content with the correct pronunciation.
The website does not fully meet the requirements regarding colors in light or dark mode, high contrast mode and font size.
Document lacks a title which describes its subject or purpose.
Content-bearing images lack text alternatives that convey the same information as the image in the current context.
Documents do not use tagged format or use tags incorrectly.
Content does not come in a meaningful order.
Images depicting text which is used to convey content.
The machine-readable name of a component in fillable fields is not the same as the visible text of the component.
Some checkboxes in fillable fields do not have a machine-readable name.
We work continuously to present as much content as possible on web pages instead of in documents.
We continuously carry out self-assessments (internal testing) with the support of our web provider.
The most recent assessment was conducted on 19 December 2025.
Updated